Hello
Certainly, throughout my investigation phase AFA was remarkable too. This was due to their policy of not disclosing their patients’ identities unless explicitly requested. Additionally, the physicians they collaborate with are exceptionally skilled and have impressive track records to my knowledge. Achieving a 6 CM extension in tibias is indeed feasible, although the process becomes more challenging after reaching 5 cm, requiring attentiveness to your body and avoiding excessive greed for an additional 1 cm or so. To address your inquiries:
1- Based on my research findings, Dr.Uysal has performed numerous CLL surgeries on both the Femur and tibias with remarkable outcomes, indicating his capability to conduct surgeries on either segment without issues.
2- Definitely! LL surgery is highly complex, necessitating regular monitoring by your physician to proactively identify and prevent potential obstacles. Dr.Uysal schedules visits with his patients at least once a month (sometimes biweekly) to ensure everything progresses smoothly. This aspect significantly influenced my decision in selecting him. Indeed, LL should not be taken lightly.
3- Initially, my plan was to opt for monorails. However, following my consultation with Dr.Uysal, I opted for Ilizarov frames instead. The rationale behind this choice is his emphasis on the lower likelihood of tibial deformities with Ilizarov frames compared to monorails (which can induce valgus). Moreover, the pins at the top and bottom of Ilizarov frames effectively stabilize the fibula to the tibia, preventing any shifts, particularly in the ankle region, thus reducing the risk of future arthritis. Although bulkier, I prioritized decreased complication and deformity risks, hence my selection of Ilizarov frames.
4- My target is a 5.5 cm extension, but if challenges arise beyond 5 cm, I may consider settling for 5.2 or 5.3 cm. Therefore, I remain hopeful for a successful outcome!
