I am approximately 169cm, possibly 170 in the morning on a good day. My current intention is to undergo a 6cm femur lengthening procedure, aiming for a minimum of 5cm to reach at least 174cm. However, my ultimate height goal has always been 180cm or slightly lower at 178 or 179cm, especially considering that most shoes would make me appear 180cm tall. This leads me to ponder whether adding 3-4cm to my tibia would be a wise choice. While this is not a definite decision for me, it would add to my personal happiness, even though I would still be around an average height of 175cm and could rely on wearing taller shoes if needed.
Given my passion for athleticism, which includes swimming, hiking, and combat sports where explosiveness is crucial, maintaining my physical abilities is a top priority. I understand that undergoing one surgery, let alone two, will inevitably impact my capabilities, but I aspire to preserve 90-95% of my athleticism to continue enjoying these activities without issues.
In light of these considerations, the key question is whether opting for additional tibia lengthening alongside the 6cm femur procedure is advisable. Alternatively, sticking to the initial 6cm femur lengthening alone could also be a viable choice. It might be beneficial to proceed with the first surgery and assess the situation before deciding on a second procedure. If the two-surgery route is chosen, adjusting the femur length to 4-5cm instead of 5-6cm could be a strategic move, as it would still result in an overall height increase of approximately 8cm rather than just 5 or 6cm.
.